If your product does not perform as described on this datasheet, we will refund or replace your product...
Read our guarantee »This product is covered by the Abpromise guarantee. Our scientific support team are available to answer any questions or queries - fill out an inquiry form for ab80892 for help.
Alternatively, you can search the previous enquiries about this product to see if your query has already been answered.
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Dear Sir/Madam I do appreciate very much your understanding and all your efforts to solve the problem. I guess it could be due to a faulty vial. Therefore, I wish to have a replacement of the same antibody with a different lot. My best regards |
|||||||||
ANSWER: |
Thank you for your understanding in this matter. I have issued a free of charge replacement of your antibody which should be with you tomorrow. The order number is xxxxxxx and the lot: xxxxxxxx. Having reviewed your protocol there are a few suggestions that I can make that may help to improve the results you have been observing so far: In order to increase the signal observed for Western blotting I would reduce the level of blocking used. I would suggest blocking for 1 hour at room temperature with 5% milk in TBS-Tween 0.1% but also to try with 1 hour at room temperature with 3% BSA in TBS-Tween 0.1%. I would then try initially incubating the antibody diluted to 1/300 in 1% BSA in TBS-tween 0.1% both for 1 hour at room temperature and overnight at 4°C. If you are not already doing so I would also strongly suggest using protease inhibitors in your lysis buffer and to make sure the cells are sufficiently lysed to use a buffer such as RIPA. A recipe for which can be found here: http://www.abcam.com/ps/pdf/protocols/WB-beginner.pdf This document also contains a more detailed guide of how we would typically recommend preparing the samples. Hopefully this new batch will prove more successful, however if you do continue to have problems please do let me know. In the meantime I wish you luck with your research. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Dear xxxx, I include images as suggested. Please do observe that in the WB experiment the faint band appearing DOES NOT correspond to the predicted MW. Best regard |
|||||||||
ANSWER: |
Thank you for confirming these details and for your cooperation. The details provided enable us to closely monitor the quality of our products. I am sorry this product did not perform as stated on the datasheet and for the inconvenience this has caused. Having reviewed your protocol I can see no reason why the antibody should not be performing. It may be that unfortunately your vial is faulty. I am appreciate the amount of time and effort you have put in to try and get this antibody to produce the results you would like and am very sorry for any inconvenience caused by this. In order to resolve this issue I can offer you a free of charge replacement of this antibody with a different lot, or if you would prefer, another antibody from our catalogue. If this is not satisfactory I can offer a credit note or refund. Please let me know how you would like to proceed and I will get it arranged as soon as possible. Many thanks for your cooperation in this matter. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Dear Sir/Madam, I recently bought a rabbit polyclonal antibody to Nanog (ab80892) lot GR40243-2. I have tested several times the same antibody at different dilutions and using both p-phormaldehyde and methanol fixatives in ICC and IHC experiments using normal and tumoral embryonic tissue (neural and tyroid). Unfortunately we did not get any signal. Moreover we tried also WB experiments but the results were the same with not even a single faint band! We are wondering whether this lot could be not working at all. Could you be so kind to check about that? Hoping to hearing from you soon My best regards |
|||||||||
ANSWER: |
Thank you for contacting us. I am sorry to hear you are experiencing difficulties with one of our products. We take product complaints very seriously, and investigate every product that we feel may not be performing correctly. I have checked back on complaints made against this antibody but there does not seem to be a lot specific problem. It may however be that the vial you have received is faulty. This does not happen frequently but it does happen. I am attaching our questionnaire so that we can gather further information regarding the samples tested and the protocol used. If you wouldn't mind completing these I will look at the protocol and see if there is any reason why the antibody may not be performing as expected. This information will also allow us to investigate this case internally and initiate additional testing where necessary. If the product was purchased in the last six months and is being used according to our Abpromise, we would be happy to replace or refund the antibody. I am sorry for any inconvenience this problem has caused and hopefully we can resolve the issue as soon as possible. I look forward to receiving your reply. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Thank you for your reply. J The problem raised from ab19857(Anti-Oct4 antibody) has been resolved by this customer. She tries to decrease the dilution factor of primary antibody from original1/500 to 1/1000 in human HCC sample (1/500 and 1/200 in mouse xenograft sample still works well), and the background is indeed reduced. But now she encounters the similar problem with ab80892 (Anti-Nanog antibody): high background in human HCC sample. She also tries to decrease the dilution factor of primary antibody. The results are : 1/50 works well in mouse xenograft model, but high background in HCC sample; then she tried 1/100 but found no signal in human HCC sample. Would you please help this cutomer provide the suggestion or the solution? Best regards, regarding the questions: 1) Sample: I assume that your customer has tried this product on xenograft as well as on human tissues. - Could you please specify the human tissue types used for immunostaining? The sample is from the clinical hepatocarcinoma cancer tissue of patient. - It would also be appreciated if you could confirm the status of the xenograft? The sample is taken out in 20th day after injection. 2) Blocking: - Please specify what blocking agent was applied? commercial blocking agent : Cell Marque Background Block Cat NO: 927B-05 Here is the detailed protocol: 1) Sample: I assume that your customer has tried this product on xenograft as well as on human tissues. - Could you please specify the human tissue types used for immunostaining? - It would also be appreciated if you could confirm the status of the xenograft? 2) Blocking: - Please specify what blocking agent was applied? 1) Abcam product code : ab80892 Anti-Nanog antibody (ab80892) lot number : gr40243-2 Purchase order number or preferably Abcam order number : 945992 2) Description of the problem High background in human HCC tissue sample, but in xenograft model it detects well. This customer injects the liver cancer cell lines (such as HuH7, Malhavu and PLC) to the mice subcutaneous tissue. After 20 days, taking the tumor out to conduct IHC-P and the results look good without background. In contrast, in the clinical human HCC tissue sample, the same condition of protocol preformed but high background presented. 4) Sample preparation: Species Human liver cancer tissue / Xenograft model (human HCC cell line inject to mouse subcutaneous tissue) Type of sample: Fresh frozen sections, perfusion fixed frozen sections, PFA/formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections, cells in culture, other: PFA/formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections Sample preparation Positive control Negative control 5) Fixation step Yes. However, The sample were obtained from the clinical patient sample of the hospital, so the accurate fixation procedure was unable to provide from her. 6) Antigen retrieval method : citric acid pH-6.0 heat a. 121℃ 30mins (for mouse and human sample) b.121℃ 40mins (for human sample) 7) Permeabilization method: Did you do a permeabilization step (details please) or add permeabilizing agent in any dilution buffers? yes Permeabilizing agent and concentration: 0.1% tween20 in wash buffer (wash buffer we using TBS) 8) Blocking agent (eg BSA, serum…): commercial blocking agent : Cell Marque Background Block Cat NO: 927B-05 Concentration, Blocking time 1hour Blocking temperature : room temperature 9) Endogenous peroxidases blocked? YES (30mins in room temperature) 60ul 30% H2O2, 30ul Methanol, 210ul TBS(total volume: 300ul) Endogenous biotins blocked? NO 10) Primary antibody (If more than one was used, describe in “additional notes”) : Concentration or dilution 1:50(work well in mouse xenograft model, but high background in HCC sample), 1:100(no signal in human HCC sample) Diluent buffer : commercial antibody diluent agent : Cell Marque Cat NO: 936B-0B Incubation time 17 hours in 4℃ 11) Secondary antibody: super sensitive polymer-HRP detection system commercial kit(Biogenex) Species, Reacts against, Concentration or dilution , Diluent buffer : anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG with enzyme polymer in phosphate buffered saline with stablizers and proclin 300 Incubation time 30mins Fluorochrome or enzyme conjugate HRP 12) Washing after primary and secondary antibodies: Buffer 0.1% tween 20 in TBS buffer Number of washes 5mins x 3 times 13) Detection method AEC (Biogenex:QD420-YIK) 14) How many times have you run this staining? 4 times Do you obtain the same results every time? YES 15)What steps have you altered to try and optimize the use of this antibody? Antigen retrieval, primary antibody dilution factor |
|||||||||
ANSWER: |
Thank you for getting back to me. I am pleased to hear that the problem with ab19857 has been sorted out after optimization. Looking through the protocol details you kindly provided for the other antibody ab80892, it seems that the antigen retrieval may be too long (121℃ 30mins and 121℃ 40mins) and the samples are over-treated. This could cause high non-specific background staining. Generally, 3 minutes is only suggested as a starting point antigen retrieval time. Less than 3 minutes may leave the antigens under-retrieved, leading to weak staining. More than 3 minutes may leave them overretrieved, leading to non-specific background staining and also increasing the chances of sections dissociating from the slides. A control experiment is recommended beforehand, where slides of the same tissue section are retrieved for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes before being immunohistochemically stained to evaluate optimum antigen retrieval time for the particular antibody being used. I hope this will be useful for you. Should you still have any problem with this antibody after following these suggestions, then please do not hesitate to contact our Technical Department again. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
LOT NUMBER GR40243-2 ORDER NUMBER 905510 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM Non-specific band SAMPLE mouse ESC lysate PRIMARY ANTIBODY Concentration or dilution- 1: 1000 Diluent buffer : 5% skim milk TBST Incubation time : O/N Incubation temperature: 4 degree DETECTION METHODECL POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONTROLS USED Positive control : sample is positive control Negative control : MEF ANTIBODY STORAGE CONDITIONS-20 SAMPLE PREPARATION Lysis buffer : RIPA Protease inhibitors: add Phosphatase:inhibitors: add Reducing agent: reduced Boiling for 5 min. AMOUNT OF PROTEIN LOADED25ug ELECTROPHORESIS/GEL CONDITIONS Percentage of gel: 10% Type of membrane : NC TRANSFER AND BLOCKING CONDITIONS Blocking agent and concentration: 5% skim milk Blocking time : 1hr 30min Blocking temperature: RT SECONDARY ANTIBODY Species: rabbit Isotype: IgG Reacts against: Concentration or dilution : 1: 2000 Diluent buffer: 5% skim milk TBST Incubation time: 2hr Incubation temperature: RT Fluorochrome or enzyme conjugate: HRP washing Buffer : TBST Number of washes : 3 times HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU TRIED THE APPLICATION? 3 HAVE YOU RUN A "NO PRIMARY" CONTROL? No DO YOU OBTAIN THE SAME RESULTS EVERY TIME? Yes WHAT STEPS HAVE YOU ALTERED? Blocking buffer: BSA -> Skim milk ADDITIONAL NOTES Our user could not detect specific result from your produc. He wants to issue a credit note from you. I attached an image file, please check this for our user. I look forward to hearing from you. |
|||||||||
ANSWER: |
Thank you for your email. I am sorry to hear that you have been experiencing problems using this antibody. Additionally thank you for sending the image as it was helpful in understanding the problem.
I have checked the protocol which looks fine to me. However by looking at the image I would say there might be problem with the buffers or running voltage.
- Image shows very diffuse band which could be due to slow migration of protein. In this case please increase voltage. Check buffer and ensure it is properly prepared. - The diffuse band could also be due to problems in sample preparation. Please heat the lysates at 95-100C for 5 minutes. - The marker bands are also not very well resolved so please check the quality of gel ingredients and prepare fresh buffers. - Try blocking membrane with 5% BSA solution which in some cases works better than milk. - Could you please check the secondary antibody also? It looks like you have use rabbit secondary. I would suggest using HRP conjugated anti rabbit secondary antibody.
I hope these suggestions will be helpful. Should you have any other questions please do not hesitate to contact us. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Please note: All products are "FOR RESEARCH USE ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR DIAGNOSTIC OR THERAPEUTIC USE"
ab80892 staining Nanog in mouse embryonic stem cells by immunocytochemistry/ immunofluorescence. Cells were paraformaldehyde fixed and permeabilized in Tween 20 prior to blocking in 20% serum for 30 minutes at 25ºC. The primary antibody was diluted 1/100 and incubated with the sample for 4 hour at 25ºC. A Cy5 conjugated goat polyclonal to rabbit IgG antibody, diluted 1/100, was used as the secondary. Nuclear staining with DAPI.
This image is courtesy of an Abreview submitted by Vladimir Mazurov
IHC-Wholemount image of anti-Nanog antibody (ab80892) staining on a mouse pre-implantation embryo. This embryo was fixed in paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.25% Triton X and then blocked in 5% serum for 1 hour at room temperature. It was stained with anti-Nanog antibody overnight at 4 degrees (right), and DAPI (left).
This image is courtesy of an anonymous abreview.
ab80892 staining mouse teratoma sections by IHC-P. The tissue was fixed with formaldehyde and a heat mediated antigen retrival step was performed with citric acid pH 6. Blocking of the sample was done with 1% BSA for 10 minutes at 21°C, followed by staining with ab80892 at 1/400 in TBS/BSA/azide for 2h at 21°C. A biotinylated goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody at 1/200 was used as the secondary antibody.
This image is courtesy of an Abreview submitted by Carl Hobbs
Overlay histogram of Nanog staining in mouse embryonic stem cells using ab80892, at 1:100 dilution. Purple histogram represents negative control (rabbit IgG); green line represents anti-Nanog antibody (ab80892).
This image is taken from an abreview by Kate Hawkins.
9
Call 01223 696 000 or contact us