JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to view this website.

72 kDa type IV collagenase (MMP2)

MMP2 Target Protein Structure

Figure 1: MMP2 Target Protein Structure.

MMP2 Introduction

Protein Function

Protein Expression

Protein Localization

ICC Experimental Results Image of MMP2 Protein, Anti-MMP2 Antibody [EPR1184] (ab92536). Green: MMP2; Red: alpha Tubulin; Blue: DAPI

Figure 2: ICC Experimental Results Image of MMP2 Protein, Anti-MMP2 Antibody [EPR1184] (ab92536). Green: MMP2; Red: alpha Tubulin; Blue: DAPI

Isoforms & Post-Translational Modifications

WB Experiment Tips

Precautions

Positive Control

Negative Control (No or Weak Expression)

Example Results

WB Experimental Results of MMP2 Protein, Anti-MMP2 Antibody [EPR17003-25] (ab181286)

Figure 3: WB Experimental Results of MMP2 Protein, Anti-MMP2 Antibody [EPR17003-25] (ab181286)

Lane 1: Mouse plasma lysate (20 µg)
Lane 2: Rat serum lysate (20 µg)
Lane 3: Mouse lung tissue lysate (20 µg)
Lane 4: Rat plasma lysate (20 µg)
Lane 5: Rat lung tissue lysate (20 µg)
Lane 6: HT1080 (human fibrosarcoma cells) whole cell lysate (10 µg)
Lane 7:Human plasma lysate (10 µg)

Predicted band size: 73 kDa
Detected band size: 72 kDa

WB Experimental Results of MMP2 Protein, Anti-MMP2 Antibody [EPR1184] (ab92536)

Figure 4: WB Experimental Results of MMP2 Protein, Anti-MMP2 Antibody [EPR1184] (ab92536)

Lane 1: L6 (rat skeletal muscle cells) whole cell lysate, 1% SDS heat denaturation method (20 µg)
Lane 2: Mouse liver tissue lysate, RIPA lysis method (20 µg)
Lane 3: Mouse liver tissue lysate, 1% SDS heat denaturation method (20 µg)
Lane 4: Raw264.7 (mouse macrophage leukemia cells) whole cell lysate, RIPA lysis method (20 µg)
Lane 5: Raw264.7 (mouse macrophage leukemia cells) whole cell lysate, 1% SDS heat denaturation method (20 µg)
Lane 6: HepG2 (human liver cancer cells) whole cell lysate, RIPA lysis method (20 µg)
Lane 7: HepG2 (human liver cancer cells) whole cell lysate, 1% SDS heat denaturation method (20 µg)

Predicted band size: 74 kDa
Detected band sizes: 69 kDa, 72 kDa

Key Control Points

In addition to the routine issues that need to be paid attention to in the experiment, special attention should be paid to the following critical control points:

Sample preparation:

  1. Add compound protease inhibitors to avoid degradation of target protein.
  2. Select appropriate lysis buffer to enrich more target protein.
  3. Ultrasonic disruption of cells to enrich target protein.
  4. Keep samples on ice during the entire sample preparation process.
  5. Determine the sample protein concentration by Bradford analysis, Lowry analysis or BCA analysis.

Blocking:

  1. There is no blocking solution suitable for all systems, please choose a suitable blocking solution.

Antibody incubation:

  1. During the WB experiment, please avoid dry membrane.
  2. Please select the appropriate antibody working concentration according to the product manual.
  3. It is recommended to use fresh antibodies and it is not recommended to reuse antibodies.

References

  1. Busti C, Falcinelli E, Momi S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and peripheral arterial disease. Intern Emerg Med. (2010) 5:13–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-009-0283-y
  2. Ezhilarasan R, Jadhav U, Mohanan I et al. The hemopexin domain of MMP-9 inhibits angiogenesis and retards the growth of intracranial glioblastoma xenograft in nude mice. Int J Cancer. (2009) 124:306-315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23951
  3. Ganea E, Trifan M, Laslo AC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases: useful and deleterious. Biochem Soc Trans. (2007) 35:989–991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0350689
  4. Zankl A, Bonafe L, Calcaterra V et al. Winchester syndrome caused by a homozygous mutation affecting the active site of matrix metalloproteinase 2. Clin Genet (2005) 67: 261–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00402.x
  5. Martignetti JA, Aqeel AA, Sewairi WA et al. Mutation of the matrix metalloproteinase 2 gene (MMP2) causes a multicentric osteolysis and arthritis syndrome. Nat Genet(2001) 28: 261–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/90100