JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to view this website.

Validating antibodies with knock-out technologies

On-demand webinar

webinar-image

Summary:

Dr. Alejandra Solache, Vice President of New Product Development at Abcam, recently discussed how we validate our antibodies using knock-out (KO) technologies. Learn about the value of gene knock-out technologies in large-scale antibody screening by watching our webinar.

Why use knock-out validation:

Several studies have demonstrated the irreproducibility of life sciences reagents, which in the case of antibodies, frequently results from a lack of specificity to their targets of interest. This lack of specificity, related to issues such as cross-reactivity and off-target protein binding, has contributed to the so-called ‘reproducibility crisis’1,2.

KO validation is one of the most accepted and trusted validation processes for antibody specificity3,4. This robust technique can confirm the specificity of an antibody by testing it in a KO cell line, cell lysate, or tissue that does not express the target protein. A specific antibody should, therefore, produce no signal in the KO cell line but give a specific signal in the wild type sample. In this way, KO validation serves as a true negative control5.

Find out more about knock-out validation

Abcam’s knock-out validation initiative

To ensure that our antibodies are specific and provide reproducible results, we apply KO validation at a large scale. We validate our antibodies in multiple applications, including flow cytometry, western blot, and immunocytochemistry, using multiple antibodies per target. Antibodies that demonstrate specificity are given a special “KO validated” designation, whereas those exhibiting off-target binding are removed from our catalog. We have now confirmed the specificity of more than 4000 antibodies with KO validation for over 2000 protein targets.

Key learnings from Abcam’s KO validation initiative:

In general, recombinant monoclonal antibodies demonstrate superior specificity and consistency compared to traditional monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies.

A significant number of top-cited antibody clones have been observed to exhibit off-target effects.

We recommend that scientists choose antibodies that have been validated across multiple applications, ideally using KO technologies. Alternatively, you can validate an antibody yourself, using the appropriate KO cell line, KO cell lysate, or tissue.

Confirming the specificity of an antibody can take time and effort, including the generation of a KO cell line using gene-editing technologies (on average 6 months to generate KOs). To help you accelerate your research and avoid tedious CRISPR engineering experiments, we now provide one of the largest collections of CRISPR-Cas9 KO lysates and KO cell lines.

All our KO cell lines and lysates are reliable, ready-to-use, and enable you to confidently advance target identification and validation without first establishing a KO cell line. All our KO cell lines are validated by Sanger sequencing, and many include additional western blot data to confirm KO at the protein level.

About Dr. Alejandra Solache

Dr. Alejandra Solache joined Abcam in December 2013 and manages Abcam’s Global New Product Development and validation teams in Cambridge, UK, Hangzhou, China as well as Eugene and Branford, CT in the USA.  Alejandra has also been instrumental in developing Abcam’s innovation strategy and product pipeline.

Before joining Abcam, Alejandra led the Antibody and Assay Development teams as R&D Director at EMD-Millipore, where she held various positions for eight years. She trained as a life science researcher where she gained expertise in immunology, cell signaling, and epigenetics through post-doctoral fellowships at the University of California, San Francisco, and the Trudeau Institute, Saranac Lake, NY.

Video Transcript

  • 00:00 - 00:19: Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to our Biologics webinar. My name is Ese, and on behalf of
  • 00:19 - 00:24: Oxford Global, I would like to thank you all for joining us today. The full recording of
  • 00:24 - 00:29: the webinar will be made available to download on our secured website, and the details will
  • 00:29 - 00:34: be sent to you after the webinar. Today, we will have Alejandra Solange, Vice President
  • 00:34 - 00:40: of New Product Development from Abcam, presenting on the technologies that support Abcam in
  • 00:40 - 00:45: the discovery, development, and validation of high-quality reagents. Please submit your
  • 00:45 - 00:50: questions through the chat option on the bottom of your menu display. Without any more delays,
  • 00:50 - 00:55: I would like to get started with Alejandra’s presentation. Alejandra, over to you.
  • 00:55 - 01:01: I am very happy to be here and to discuss a topic that I believe is key for reproducibility
  • 01:01 - 01:07: in scientific research. Today, we will discuss how antibody selection, and in particular,
  • 01:07 - 01:13: how the use of recombinant antibody technologies and high standards in antibody characterization
  • 01:13 - 01:19: in multiple applications, including knockout cell lines and other validation strategies,
  • 01:19 - 01:21: support scientific reproducibility.
  • 01:26 - 01:32: High-quality antibodies are a combined result of thoughtful, effective strategies for immunogen
  • 01:32 - 01:39: design and protein expression, antibody development and production, as well as specificity
  • 01:40 - 01:46: validation and strict batch testing. The choice of antibody format combined with high standards
  • 01:46 - 01:53: in manufacturing has a great impact on specificity, antibody performance, and consistency.
  • 01:53 - 02:00: This presentation will be divided into parts. We will start by discussing the advantages and
  • 02:00 - 02:06: constraints of the available antibody formats and host species, as well as the benefits of
  • 02:06 - 02:12: recombinant rabbit monoclonals and why, at Abcam, we have adopted them as the format of choice.
  • 02:13 - 02:19: In the second part, I will discuss how Abcam’s validation is constantly evolving by adopting
  • 02:19 - 02:24: new technologies to assess specificity. In particular, I will share with you one of the
  • 02:24 - 02:30: most exciting initiatives that we have in Abcam, which is the incorporation of
  • 02:30 - 02:33: knockout technologies in our antibody validation.
  • 02:34 - 02:41: So, the choice of antibody format can significantly influence the consistency of our results,
  • 02:41 - 02:45: and the performance of an antibody can be very closely linked to how they are manufactured.
  • 02:47 - 02:53: Antibodies have been traditionally developed in two main formats, polyclonals or monoclonals.
  • 02:53 - 02:58: The polyclonal antibody process generates a large variety of antibodies to different
  • 02:59 - 03:05: epitopes on the antigen used for immunization. Although this can be advantageous for some
  • 03:05 - 03:10: applications, this can also be a significant source of background and cross-reactivity.
  • 03:10 - 03:17: The complexity of polyclonal antibodies is further complicated by their finite nature,
  • 03:17 - 03:23: and once a batch has been depleted, you need to initiate another immunization,
  • 03:23 - 03:26: and therefore the antibody performance may vary significantly.
  • 03:26 - 03:32: In contrast, monoclonal antibodies are manufactured from hybridoma lines,
  • 03:32 - 03:40: where the antibody-producing B-cells are isolated and immortalized by fusing them to
  • 03:40 - 03:46: a myeloma or a cancer cell line, and the derived hybridoma-produced antibodies
  • 03:47 - 03:52: recognize a single epitope in the target protein. Once a hybridoma clone has been
  • 03:52 - 03:58: identified, it can continue to be produced by culturing the hybridoma cell line in tissue
  • 03:58 - 04:03: culture, and if properly maintained, they should have no batch-to-batch variability.
  • 04:03 - 04:10: However, in some instances, if hybridomas are poorly developed or maintained poorly,
  • 04:10 - 04:16: it is possible that they will experience loss of yield or binding activity caused by sequence drift.
  • 04:16 - 04:23: Polyclonal antibodies have been used for many years, and they became the reagent of choice when
  • 04:23 - 04:28: access to monoclonal technologies was not widely available, and although there are some very good
  • 04:28 - 04:35: and specific polyclonal antibodies, if you have the choice between a polyclonal or a monoclonal
  • 04:35 - 04:42: antibody that has been validated
  • 04:43 - 04:50: for the applications that you need for your experiments. Our recommendation
  • 04:50 - 04:55: is to choose a monoclonal as, in general, it will provide a more reliable option.
  • 04:58 - 05:03: An alternative to both polyclonal and traditionally produced monoclonals is to produce
  • 05:04 - 05:10: antibodies through a recombinant platform. A recombinant antibody is generated by using the
  • 05:10 - 05:17: antibody coding genes from a B cell producing the antibody and cloning those genes into a vector
  • 05:17 - 05:26: and expressing them in a mammalian cell. This can be done from the beginning, as
  • 05:27 - 05:35: what you do for a polyclonal, immunizing a rabbit, for example, and isolating circulating B cells and
  • 05:35 - 05:43: then cloning the antibody-producing cells, or utilizing an existing hybridoma where you can
  • 05:43 - 05:50: convert the recombinant antibodies by synthesizing a clone using the hybridoma DNA sequence and
  • 05:51 - 05:59: expressing it in a mammalian cell line as well. Alternatively, the recombinant monoclonals can
  • 05:59 - 06:06: be developed in a totally in vitro approach and phage display has become incredibly useful for
  • 06:06 - 06:12: this application. Phage display offers the opportunity to make antibodies against difficult
  • 06:12 - 06:19: targets such as toxins that were previously difficult to achieve using in vivo technologies.
  • 06:19 - 06:23: Abcam’s Axiomics high throughput phage display technology
  • 06:26 - 06:34: uses a high diversity synthetic library which is designed to allow efficient affinity maturation
  • 06:34 - 06:40: and rapid cloning to give a full recombinant antibody. Antibody discovery using this technique
  • 06:40 - 06:47: has benefits across a wide array of applications and can provide a suitable discovery approach for
  • 06:47 - 06:54: certain challenging targets. So recombinant antibodies have multiple advantages over
  • 06:54 - 07:00: polyclonal and standard hybridoma produced antibodies, such as improved consistency and
  • 07:00 - 07:07: reproducibility. Once sequenced, the recombinant antibodies are not subject to loss of activity
  • 07:07 - 07:13: caused by sequence drift or loss of yield, both of which can affect hybridomas if they are poorly
  • 07:13 - 07:19: maintained. The engineered nature of the recombinant antibodies makes it easier to
  • 07:19 - 07:26: improve both antibody specificity and sensitivity if required. And once an antibody has been cloned,
  • 07:26 - 07:31: recombinant antibody production provides a scalable, fully in vitro system to
  • 07:31 - 07:38: consistently produce antibodies that are identical from batch to batch, which eliminates the variation
  • 07:38 - 07:45: in results between batches that is inherent to antibodies like polyclonals. In terms of
  • 07:45 - 07:50: antibody selection for your own experiments, a recombinant antibody is the most robust format
  • 07:50 - 07:56: available and we recommend them if you have a choice over standard hybridoma monoclonals and
  • 07:56 - 08:04: certainly over polyclonals. Another critical consideration when developing and selecting
  • 08:04 - 08:11: antibodies is the species where the antibody has been generated. Multiple host species have
  • 08:11 - 08:17: been utilized over the years to develop antibodies, particularly when the monoclonal technologies were
  • 08:17 - 08:24: not fully developed. Polyclonal antibodies were the choice and species such as goat, sheep, chicken,
  • 08:24 - 08:31: and particularly rabbits were widely used. Until early 90s, when rabbit monoclonal technology
  • 08:31 - 08:43: became available with the discovery of a rabbit myeloma cell line, known as 240E,
  • 08:45 - 08:53: these most monoclonal antibodies were typically produced in mice, yet their antibody-producing
  • 08:53 - 09:00: cells are unable to generate every kind of antibody required as we discussed. In contrast,
  • 09:00 - 09:07: rabbits have a unique immune system compared with other species such as mouse, rat, and chicken.
  • 09:08 - 09:13: Rabbits have a large B-cell repertoire that can generate a diverse range of antibodies.
  • 09:14 - 09:21: The rabbit’s immune system also optimizes affinity by using two different mechanisms
  • 09:21 - 09:27: of affinity maturation. One is gene conversion and the second one is somatic hypermutation.
  • 09:27 - 09:33: This means that rabbit antibodies are better at distinguishing subtle differences such as
  • 09:33 - 09:39: epitope variations, post-translational modifications, and conformational changes due to
  • 09:39 - 09:47: larger and more diverse B-cell repertoire. Rabbits also produce high-affinity antibodies,
  • 09:47 - 09:53: even against targets that are not immunogenic in mice, having a significantly higher affinity for
  • 09:54 - 09:58: a target antigen on average than most mouse monoclonals.
  • 10:00 - 10:05: And to overcome the limitations of the mouse model at Abcam, we combined the unique properties
  • 10:05 - 10:13: of the rabbit immune system and antibody technology, monoclonal antibody technology,
  • 10:13 - 10:19: to generate rabbit monoclonals. When compared to other common antibody platforms,
  • 10:19 - 10:23: rabbit monoclonal antibodies have the highest affinity and specificity.
  • 10:25 - 10:31: But going even further, we have combined the high affinity and specificity of rabbit monoclonals
  • 10:31 - 10:39: with our rabbit recombinant technologies through NGS, hybridoma, or direct B-cell cloning process.
  • 10:39 - 10:46: And the result of these features is a recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibody that is specific and
  • 10:46 - 10:54: very sensitive to the target or molecule of interest, therefore providing a significant
  • 10:54 - 11:03: advantage over rabbit monoclonals and mouse monoclonals. Our recombinant rabbit monoclonal
  • 11:03 - 11:09: technology was recently used to develop a panel of antibodies to a promising immunotherapy and
  • 11:09 - 11:17: diagnostic target known as B-cell maturation antigen, or BCMA. BCMA regulation has been
  • 11:17 - 11:25: identified in B-cell malignancies, malignancies such as multiple myeloma. Antibodies that bind
  • 11:25 - 11:34: both mouse and human versions of BCMA are needed to support fundamental research into the biology
  • 11:34 - 11:41: of BCMA in parallel to efforts being carried out to advance protein therapeutics. The desired
  • 11:41 - 11:49: antibody that we wanted to generate against BCMA had to bind both mouse and human versions of BCMA.
  • 11:50 - 11:56: And as the rabbit immune system offers options for both human and mouse reactivity, the RabMAb
  • 11:56 - 12:03: technology was an obvious choice to produce a series of high affinity, sub-nanomolar affinity,
  • 12:03 - 12:13: anti-BCMA antibodies. Using the Octet system from ForteBio, we were able to identify recombinant
  • 12:13 - 12:22: rabbit monoclonals that bind with high affinity to human and mouse BCMA. And as specified and
  • 12:22 - 12:31: requested, they do not recognize any other protein targets. These recombinant rabbit monoclonals
  • 12:31 - 12:37: are also suitable for multiple applications, including immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry,
  • 12:37 - 12:44: western blotting, and immunoprecipitation. Furthermore, antibodies displaying antagonism
  • 12:44 - 12:56: for BCMA ligand binding were also characterized. So in addition to being able to generate specific
  • 12:56 - 13:01: immune oncology antibodies for particular application requirements, our expertise
  • 13:01 - 13:07: in rabbit monoclonal technology also offers a significant advantage when generating antibody
  • 13:07 - 13:14: pairs that can work together in the same assay. The challenge here is to find two antibodies
  • 13:14 - 13:19: against the same target that recognize different epitopes and work well together.
  • 13:20 - 13:25: Developing these antibody pairs in mice is difficult due to the limited immune repertoire
  • 13:25 - 13:31: of the mouse, and rabbit monoclonals provide a much better alternative. As you can see here,
  • 13:31 - 13:41: when we generated these antibody pairs utilizing rabbit polyclonal pair against human IL-1
  • 13:41 - 13:48: receptor alpha, the sensitivity wasn’t that great. When we actually generated this
  • 13:49 - 13:57: assay utilizing a rabbit monoclonal pair, we identified a tenfold increase in sensitivity.
  • 13:58 - 14:05: So this basically highlights another great use of this, and we are utilizing all of these rabbit
  • 14:06 - 14:14: recombinant antibodies also for the generation of our Simple Stabilizer and also multiplex assays.
  • 14:14 - 14:25: So, as we discussed before, generating antibodies with high specificity and consistency requires a
  • 14:25 - 14:30: multifaceted approach, and we have embedded the highest quality standards in every step,
  • 14:31 - 14:37: as well as utilizing the most reliable antibody development process. Because of this, we are
  • 14:37 - 14:44: moving primarily to recombinant antibody generation for all of our new antibodies.
  • 14:45 - 14:51: However, regardless of the antibody format, antibodies require in-depth antibody characterization
  • 14:51 - 14:59: in order to ensure that they bind the target of interest in multiple applications
  • 14:59 - 15:03: and that they do not cross-react with proteins of high homology, for example.
  • 15:04 - 15:07: At Abcam, we are also working towards providing the highest level
  • 15:07 - 15:13: of validation and striving for 100% batch-to-batch consistency.
  • 15:17 - 15:23: So, at Abcam, we have incorporated a range of assays and applications to ensure that we can
  • 15:23 - 15:29: assess specificity and selectivity during early development at the clone screening stage,
  • 15:30 - 15:37: as well as during the final characterization of the antibody. During the antibody screening process,
  • 15:38 - 15:46: assays such as ELISA and label-free assays are essential as they are high throughput and provide
  • 15:47 - 15:53: a lot of information on the binding and affinity of the antibody for the target.
  • 15:53 - 15:59: We aim to provide validation in as many applications as possible, including western
  • 15:59 - 16:06: blotting, ICC, IHC, flow cytometry, IP, ChIP. And we tailor these applications depending on
  • 16:06 - 16:12: the target of interest. For example, if it is a phosphorylated target, we will try,
  • 16:12 - 16:20: we will do a stimulation of the cells to increase the phosphorylation of that particular target.
  • 16:21 - 16:32: And if it is, for example, an anti-histone modified protein, we will test in peptide
  • 16:32 - 16:40: arrays, for example, and ChIP or ChIP-seq. Abcam’s validation is constantly evolving
  • 16:40 - 16:47: and by adopting new technologies to confirm specificity. And we now have access to new tools,
  • 16:47 - 16:53: new tools such as mass spectrometry or high throughput arrays, as well as we have the
  • 16:53 - 16:59: ability to knock down or knock out genes and alter protein expression in cells and animals,
  • 16:59 - 17:05: which allow us to better assess reagent specificity and to be more precise than ever before.
  • 17:06 - 17:12: Although there is not one single solution to antibody validation, and each method has pros
  • 17:12 - 17:21: and cons, we always try to use a combination of these methodologies. And we have embarked on
  • 17:22 - 17:31: large-scale antibody validation using knockout models, as in the context of antibody specificity,
  • 17:31 - 17:35: knockout models provide an excellent standard for antibody validation as they represent
  • 17:35 - 17:43: a true negative control for most proteins expressed. Of course, using knockout cell lines
  • 17:43 - 17:48: as negative control won’t always be appropriate as essential genes cannot be knocked out.
  • 17:49 - 17:56: However, this can be utilized as a model for a lot of the proteins of interest. The way we do
  • 17:56 - 18:01: these assays is to have a comparison of the wild-type cell line and the knockout cell line,
  • 18:01 - 18:07: and we also have additional control cell lines in which the target of interest is endogenously
  • 18:07 - 18:13: expressed. We select multiple antibodies to the target and we do the experiment in several
  • 18:13 - 18:18: applications. Here I’m showing an example of a western blot application when we are testing
  • 18:19 - 18:26: different antibodies, where we have tested antibodies to PKC-alpha. And in this case,
  • 18:26 - 18:33: what you see is that the band of interest, the band representing PKC-alpha, goes away in the
  • 18:33 - 18:41: knockout. So, this highlights that the antibody is specific for the target of interest. You can also
  • 18:41 - 18:49: have the other side of the coin, and this is when you see off-target binding of the antibody.
  • 18:50 - 18:56: And in this particular case, you will see the off-target binding by the band of interest
  • 18:57 - 19:07: doesn’t disappear in the knockout sample. Whenever we see these cases, we will remove the product
  • 19:07 - 19:12: from the catalog and we will contact the scientists that have purchased this antibody in the past
  • 19:12 - 19:15: to let them know that this antibody was not specific.
  • 19:19 - 19:24: We started this validation using mostly western blot, but we have expanded it to several other
  • 19:24 - 19:31: relevant applications that are pertinent for the target of interest and the area of research where
  • 19:31 - 19:37: you will be utilizing these antibodies. In this example, we can show that we have tested this
  • 19:37 - 19:51: antibody in ICC and flow cytometry. And so far, we have tested over 2,000 antibodies that have
  • 19:51 - 19:59: been validated to recognize the target protein through knockout models. And we continue to
  • 19:59 - 20:06: validate a growing number of antibodies. We have learned a lot through this endeavor,
  • 20:06 - 20:14: and we have found that recombinant antibodies were found to be much more specific than other
  • 20:15 - 20:19: monoclonal antibodies, and particularly over polyclonal antibodies.
  • 20:21 - 20:28: However, other interesting learnings are that top-sided antibodies are not always the best
  • 20:28 - 20:39: antibody, as we have found some top-sided antibodies that were cross-reacting with
  • 20:39 - 20:46: proteins in the knockout samples. And this is just to highlight that we need to do our homework when
  • 20:46 - 20:52: looking and searching for antibodies. As a top-sided antibody won’t be necessarily the best,
  • 20:52 - 21:02: we will need to find evidence of specificity wherever, whenever possible. And the best
  • 21:02 - 21:07: is to search for antibodies that have been validated in multiple applications
  • 21:08 - 21:12: and confirm specificity by multiple strategies.
  • 21:13 - 21:18: So, being specialists at making antibodies has been core to our mission for over 20 years.
  • 21:18 - 21:24: We are also actively working to meet the industry needs for the development of exceptional,
  • 21:24 - 21:31: high-performing IHC antibodies to key diagnostic and therapeutic targets. An example of an antibody
  • 21:32 - 21:39: that is supporting in vitro diagnostics is our anti-pan-TK, or antigen, antibody.
  • 21:39 - 21:44: Roche has recently announced the launch of the first in vitro diagnostic
  • 21:46 - 21:55: for detecting variations in TRK receptors by IHC, which utilizes our rabbit monoclonal anti-pan-TRK.
  • 21:57 - 22:02: And this assay provides an important new tool to help us better understand the role of
  • 22:02 - 22:08: TRK protein expression, particularly fusions in cancer, and to identify cancer patients who may be suitable for several targeted cancer treatments.
  • 22:10 - 22:27: The rabbit monoclonal anti-pan-TRK antibody used in this assay was developed using recombinant technology
  • 22:27 - 22:33: and validated in multiple applications for specificity. These traits make the antibody
  • 22:33 - 22:39: ideal for use in companion diagnostics, and they allow clinicians to generate consistent
  • 22:39 - 22:43: and reproducible results between every diagnostic test they run.
  • 22:47 - 22:52: In summary, we are very proud to be generating high-quality recombinant antibodies and validating
  • 22:52 - 22:59: using the highest standards. In order to provide you with antibodies that have excellent sensitivity
  • 22:59 - 23:05: with the highest degree of consistency, we have engineered recombinant versions of our rabbit
  • 23:05 - 23:13: monoclonal antibodies, and we have now over 18,000 recombinant monoclonal antibodies,
  • 23:14 - 23:23: over 1,800 recombinant matched antibody pairs, SimpleStep ELISAs, and multiplex assays.
  • 23:24 - 23:30: And a lot of these antibodies have been validated in knockout models.
  • 23:30 - 23:37: As I mentioned before, these reagents are now utilized in diagnostic tests and supporting
  • 23:37 - 23:43: translational research through our partnerships across pharma and diagnostics. And this really,
  • 23:44 - 23:49: this really increases the bar in our responsibility not only to the scientific
  • 23:49 - 23:54: community in terms of reproducibility, but by providing the highest-quality reagents,
  • 23:54 - 23:57: we are also contributing to improving health outcomes.
  • 24:01 - 24:06: Now, I would like to thank ForteBio for inviting us to present here,
  • 24:06 - 24:09: and I would be very happy to take any questions.
  • 24:14 - 24:18: Thanks, Alejandra, for this wonderful presentation. We really enjoyed it.
  • 24:18 - 24:22: Now, I would like to open the floor for discussion. Please remember to send us
  • 24:22 - 24:27: your questions using the chat feature of the platform. How many antibodies have
  • 24:27 - 24:31: you tested that haven’t fulfilled the criteria described in your talk?
  • 24:32 - 24:42: Yeah, there have been around 500 antibodies that have not passed our specificity criteria in the
  • 24:42 - 24:47: knockout models. And this is something that I’m really proud to say that we have removed them
  • 24:47 - 24:54: all from the catalog and contacted the scientists that have purchased those antibodies in the past.
  • 24:55 - 24:59: Great. Thank you very much. The next question we received is the following.
  • 24:59 - 25:03: To rule out antibody cross-reactivity as part of antibody validation,
  • 25:03 - 25:09: are you mapping the actual linear or conformational epitope by, for example,
  • 25:09 - 25:12: customized peptide arrays as an advanced quality control?
  • 25:15 - 25:23: Yes, absolutely. We are just utilizing a proprietary peptide array, particularly for
  • 25:23 - 25:32: histone modified targets. And in those cases, we have an array with all of the potential
  • 25:32 - 25:44: modifications in the histone targets. And we test all of our antibodies against modified histones
  • 25:44 - 25:49: in this target. And that’s just one example. Great. Thank you very much for this.
  • 25:49 - 25:55: Why haven’t you tested all of your antibodies for specificity trait target using knockout cell lines?
  • 25:57 - 26:06: So, as I mentioned, some of these knockout cell lines cannot be used for all targets, since
  • 26:09 - 26:17: any genes that are essential will not be, we won’t be able to knockout as the cell will not survive.
  • 26:17 - 26:26: And therefore, this is one area that we have, that we are utilizing different types of
  • 26:26 - 26:34: technologies to test, as well as we are going through where we have available knockout cell
  • 26:34 - 26:41: lines, as well as where they match with the antibodies that we have.
  • 26:41 - 26:46: Thank you very much for your questions. And once again, Alejandra, thank you very much for this
  • 26:46 - 26:52: excellent presentation. The 2020 Proteins and Antibodies UK Congress will be taking place in
  • 26:52 - 26:58: April next year in London, UK. If you would like further information on the Congress, or would like
  • 26:58 - 27:03: a copy of the conference program, please contact the marketing department or visit the event’s
  • 27:03 - 27:08: official website. On behalf of Oxford Global, I would like to thank everybody for joining us today.
  • 27:08 - 27:13: I would like to say a big thank you once again to Alejandra, who has put a lot of time into
  • 27:13 - 27:19: making sure that this webinar was as interesting and valuable as possible. All that remains to be
  • 27:19 - 27:24: said is have a great day, and we look forward to welcoming you at one of our future events.

References

  1. Bradbury, A., Plückthun, A. Reproducibility: Standardize antibodies used in research. Nature. 518, 27–29 (2015).
  2. Baker, M. Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies. Nature. 521, 274–276 (2015).
  3. Madhusoodanan, J. Validating Antibodies: An Urgent Need. TheScientist. 2014.
  4. Rhodes, K.J., Trimmer, J.S. Antibody-based validation of CNS ion channel drug targets. J Gen Physiol. 131, 407–413 (2008).
  5. Bordeaux, J., Welsh, A., Agarwal, S., et al. Antibody validation. Biotechniques. 48, 197–209 (2010).

You may be interested in...