For the best experience on the Abcam website please upgrade to a modern browser such as Google Chrome
If you continue without changing your cookie settings, we'll assume you’re happy with this.
Novel strategies for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with low input samples.
Improving enrichment efficiency and sample loss
To counter this, several adjustments to the ChIP workflow have been proposed for low input samples to increase enrichment efficiency1 and minimize sample loss2.
Platform choice and downstream sample processing
In addition to the assay itself, the choice and optimization of downstream processing (ie sequencing, array, or PCR) and bioinformatic analysis are also important.
The Abcam high-sensitivity ChIP assay
Embarking on ChIP with low sample input quantities can be a daunting prospect. Our high-sensitivity ChIP kit (ab185913) has been developed specifically for this application:
1. Mao. Accounting for immunoprecipitation inefficiences in the statistical analysis of ChIP-Seq data. BMC Bionformatics. 14, 169 (2013).
2. Dirks, R. Genome-wide epigenomic profiling for biomarker discovery. Clinical Epigenetics. 8, 122. (2016).
3. Cejas, P. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation from fixed clinical tissues reveals tumor-specific enhancer profiles. Nature Medicine. 22, 685. (2016).
4. Reverberi, R. Factors affecting the antigen-antibody reaction. Blood transfusion. 5, 227. (2007).
5. Gilfillian, G. Limitations and possibilities of low cell number CHIP-SEQ. BMC Genomcis. 13, 645. (2012).
6. Xiong, X. A scalable epitope tagging approach for high throughput ChIP-Seq analysis. ACS Synth biol . (2017, Feb 19).
7. ENCODE. (n.d.). ENCODE Platform Comparison. Retrieved from https://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE/platform_characterization.html
8. Schmidl, C. ChIPmentation: fast, robust, low-input ChIP-Seq for histones and transcription factors. Nature Methods. 12, 963. (2015).
9. Bolduc, N. Preparation of low-input and ligation-free librarIes using template-switching technology. In Current protocols in molecular biology (Vol. Unit 7.26). Wiley & Sons. (2016).
10. Kidder, B. ChIP-Seq: Technical considerations for obtaining high quality data. Nature Immunology. 12, 918. (2011).
11. Stelloo, S. Androgen receptor profiling predicts prostate cancer outcome. EMBO Mol Med. 7, 1450. (2015).